Friday, February 28, 2020
The modernization theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words
The modernization theory - Essay Example This multi-dimensional orientation of the concept give it a much wider and bigger scope to cover and discuss many important and critical issues of the modern world and specially those faced by the developing countries. In effect, Modernization theories study the impact of modernization process on the human communication and in doing so explore many critical and important issues which may serve as the reconciliation points between the developed and developing world. However these modernization and development theories are controversial also as the most underdeveloped societies due to their strong cultural, religious and economic values find it hard to embarrass a change which has not emerged indigenously. This study will explore the modernization and development process besides providing a critical analysis of the theoretical framework and the impact of cultural invariance on the modernization and development process and the societies. The historical orientation of the modernization and development process suggest that it is a macro-theory with historical and sociological inspirations. (Universiteit Twente). It is believed that the theories of modernization and development were developed in order to assess its impact on the human communication. Gidden defined modernization as ââ¬Å"the appearance of the modes of social life of organization which emerged in Europe from about the seventeenth century onwards and which subsequently became more or less worldwide in their influenceâ⬠(Giddens). Therefore in effect, modernization defines the changing ways of the communication taking place in modern and traditional society. In its essence the modernization and development theories suggest that the western values and practices are best and that if replicated by the developing countries can prove beneficial to the long term
Wednesday, February 12, 2020
Management Styles in the Criminal Justice System Assignment
Management Styles in the Criminal Justice System - Assignment Example Introduction There are three management systems in use in the Justice System and at any given time, one component of a particular system may be more evident than another system, dependent on the circumstances, It is important to note each system and what its components are in order to see how they work together in the best infrastructure possible. When one component is lacking, then this can also cause a problem along the administrative chain. 1. There are three types of management styles in the criminal justice system: Scientific Management, Human Relations Management and Systems Management. The Scientific Management, first instituted by Frederick W. Taylor, was the first to develop and institute this efficiency process which concerned how to get the best out of workers in a manufacturing business and boost production. A formal level of administrative infrastructure is installed which relates to authority, chain of command, the span of control and division of labor (Peak 2010). The implementation of such a system, particularly when applied to the Justice administrative system through POSDCORB (planning, organizing, staffing, directing, coordinating, reporting and budgeting), rarely addressed the human component of the workers (Peak 2010; Dempsey & Forst 2013). This led to a sense of depersonalization of the job for most workers, a rather robotic method of working which was not fulfilling. For many, getting a salary was important but it was not the whole picture as to why they were in the law enforcement profession. In Human Relations Management, the worker faces a more social environment at work that relates to being part of a group. In some aspects, it could be considered the family away from home in that everyone looks out for the other person and that it is more team-orientated within a job aspect (Peak 2010). In this respect, those management employees who were centered more on their employees and morale, rather than only quotas and production, achieved mo re with the department as a whole. Workers felt they could also make suggestions for better efficiency in operations as they were on the front row of things in the field. Yet, with the lack of emphasis on production, employees tended to want more while achieving less overall. In Systems Management, which began implementation in the 1960s, components of both previous systems were incorporated into the Systems Management infrastructure, thus addressing the human component, along with achieving goals and production levels, that were necessary for measuring success (or failure) in any department. Systems Management is based on the works of four people: Douglas McGregor (theory of human motivation), Abraham Maslow (hierarchy of needs), and Robert Blake and Jane Mouton (managerial grid). The grid centered on tasking and on people within systems management. The overall concept of systems management, according to these four people, was that managers also understand the needs of other groups and people as they affected his own group and to also understand and cope with conflict and adjustments from changes (Peak 2010). 2. The most useful style of management is the Systems Management because it incorporates the best of the previous two systems. The ability to create the organized infrastructure that will produce results within an administrated work map, as well as
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)